[Antibiotic use in patients with renal or hepatic failure]. / Uso de antimicrobianos en pacientes con insuficiencia renal o hepática.

Renal or hepatic failure implies the need adjust the dosage of antibiotics that are eliminated in active form through the kidneys or metabolized through the liver. In the first case, the dose should be reduced by 30% for each level of renal impairment (moderate and severe). In hepatic failure, there is no general rule, and the specific information provided for each antibiotic should be used. Hemodialysis clears antibiotics with a low molecular weight, and a reduced protein binding and distribution volume. Thus, the dose should be administered immediately after the session or a supplementary dose should be provided. When the most intensive extrarenal clearance techniques are used, the presence of a high volume of distribution is the only guarantee that the antibiotic will not be eliminated.

Update on bacterial pathogens: virulence and resistance.

The present article is an update of the literature on bacterial pathogens. Recognizing the interest and scientific and public health importance of infections produced by bacterial pathogens with new virulence mechanisms and/or new mechanisms of resistance to antimicrobial agents, a multidisciplinary group of Spanish physicians and microbiologists organized a joint session and revised the most important papers produced in the field during 2006. Each article was analyzed and discussed by one of the members of the panel. This paper focus on a variety of diseases that pose major clinical and public health challenges today; and include infections produced by community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus and S. aureus small colony variants, infections produced by multiply resistant coagulase-negative staphylococci, pneumococcal infections, human listeriosis, meningococcal disease, Haemophilus influenzae, pertussis, Escherichia coli, ESBL-producing organisms, and infections due to non-fermenters. After a review of the state of the art, papers selected in this field are discussed.

El presente artículo recoge una actualización bibliográfica de patógenos bacterianos. Dado el interés científico y la importancia que tienen para la salud pública las infecciones producidas por patógenos bacterianos con nuevos mecanismos de virulencia y/o nuevos mecanismos de resistencia a los antimicrobianos, un grupo multidisciplinario de microbiólogos y clínicos españoles, con experiencia en enfermedades infecciosas, organizó una reunión en la que se revisaron los artículos más importantes en este campo, publicados en 2006.El contenido de cada uno de los artículos seleccionados fue expuesto y discutido por uno de los miembros del grupo. Este artículo revisa algunas de las enfermedades infecciosas bacterianas que suponen hoy en día algunos de los principales retos para la salud pública e incluye las infecciones producidas por Staphylococcus aureus resistente a meticilina de adquisición comunitaria, las producidas por variantes de colonia pequeña de S. aureus, las relacionadas con estafilococos coagulasa negativa multirresistentes, la infección neumocócica, la listeriosis humana, la infección meningocócica, la tos ferina, las infecciones por Haemophilus influenzae, la diseminación de las bacterias productoras de BLEE, y las infecciones por bacilos gramnegativos no fermentadores. Tras la revisión de la situación actual, se discuten y comentan diferentes artículos relacionados con estos aspectos.

Cost-effectiveness analysis of schizophrenia relapse prevention : an economic evaluation of the ZEUS (Ziprasidone-Extended-Use-In-Schizophrenia) study in Spain.

OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to estimate the cost-effectiveness of schizophrenia relapse prevention in Spain using data from the ZEUS (Ziprasidone-Extended-Use-in-Schizophrenia) study. METHODS: Treatment of schizophrenia was modeled over 1 year using a retrospective deterministic model from the Spanish National Health System (NHS) perspective (year 2005). The primary outcome was the probability of relapse occurring within a 52-week period of treatment with daily doses of ziprasidone 40-160mg versus placebo. Data were obtained from a randomised, double-blind clinical trial (n = 218 patients). Antipsychotic cost, concomitant medications to treat adverse events (for example extrapyramidal symptoms) and medical costs associated with adverse events were derived from the clinical trial results and a Spanish health cost database. The average cost of a relapse admitted to hospital in Spain (3421 euro) was obtained from a retrospective study. RESULTS: The probability of psychosis relapse was 0.77 with placebo, and 0.43, 0.35, 0.36 and 0.38 with ziprasidone daily doses of 40, 80, 160mg and average dose, respectively (p < 0.01 vs placebo in all cases). The average annual incremental cost per relapse avoided was 186 euro for the average dose, ranging from a saving of 557 euro (80 mg/day) to an incremental cost of 1015 euro (160 mg/day), and was lower in all cases than the minimum cost of a relapse (2830 euro). CONCLUSIONS: According to this evaluation, psychosis relapse prevention with ziprasidone is cost effective compared with no treatment from the Spanish NHS perspective. Ziprasidone therapy avoids a considerable number of relapses at a reasonable cost, producing cost savings.